It was in the case of Katto v. CBN (1999)6 NWLR (Pt.607)390 S.C. that the Supreme Court held that an employee whose employment is terminated in breach of the requirement of notice or payment of salary in lieu is entitled to compensation in the amount that would have been paid instead of notice.
In other words, what the above means is that an employee is entitled to compensation when his employer terminates his employment without adequate notice or payment of his salary instead.
Hope you got value.
Kindly let us know in the comments if you do.
